It only takes me a couple of seconds to realize that the YouTube video I just watched wasn’t as entertaining as I’d hoped. The hit has been registered and the “uploader” has received credit for something cleverly named and yet lacking any real content. Their 3 minute compilation video of horses, cats, aliens, conspiracy theory or fails;   will yet receive a bunch more hits before something actually entertaining knocks it of the Most Viewed Today list.  We are all easily trapped by the deceptive title, “Star Trek and its parallels to human behaviour”.

It only takes a thousand or so hits for a content uploader to make money from the stupid and pointless ads that Google attaches the content, and thats all they really want. It annoys me that other more ‘legitimate’ content creators are forever struggling to created new and clever skits, hoping to retain and to attract new subscribers, all the while fighting this kind of ‘cut and copy’ uploader for 3 minutes of my time.

It seems to me that 3 minutes is about all they can get. Our attention spans must be pretty short, possibly from all that channel surfing on the 1920′s invention the Television. We’ll watch 15 minutes of a television program we find entertaining then during the commercials we hope to find something else on another channel equally as entertaining, something that will fill the 3 minutes until the original show comes back on. Disgustingly we spend 2 minutes jumping channels until something that looks good, and isn’t a commercial grabs our attention. We watch it for 2 minutes hoping it satisfies, and maybe it does and maybe it doesn’t, but we find ourselves going back to find the thing we where watching before only to realize, we’ve missed key dialog and the plot or ending is missed.

Likewise we’ll catch the end of a song on the radio (an invention of the 1910′s) and wait endlessly for it to be played again . We’ll find that after 2 hours you’ve heard the same a second time but that 3 minutes was all we were looking for yet we listen to a bunch more of 3 minute songs and 3 minute ad breaks and 3 minute interruption by the announcers to get it. In the old days anyway we’d go out and sing the song to some record shop owner hoping they’d know the tune, but today we use apps on the smart phones to listen for us and tell us the song. All so we can hear it again without having to wait through someone elses 3 minutes of ill conceived drivel.

Clearly entertainment is found in 3 minute increments.

Jan 082012
 

‘They’ say at 40 the best years are ahead of you. As I sit eating my breakfast at the top of Clear Mountain overlooking Brisbane, I can’t help think that ‘they’ may be right. From the symbolic view of the top of my life’s mountain, I realize that I’m about halfway done. There is so much to yet try out, so much excitement to be had, but it will probably be spent sleeping, eating, working and spending time with family and friends.

Still, the next 40 years will be spent helping my children and those around me focus on the important things in life. They’ll all come along for the ride because I’m traveling down the hill now and I understand that’s so much more fun that the climb up. So hang on, here we go!!

Unsubscribed

 Random  Comments Off
Dec 012011
 

Hi, and thanks or coming. You probably didn’t get here from a email list, but thanks for coming anyway.

I opened my email today and was unsurprised to find 12 new emails today. For me that’s not at all many, but significantly only 1 was from someone I knew. The other 11 where as a result of legit subscriptions from websites where I bought something recently; and they’ve included me on the opt in list.

I can tolerate these emails for a while, but after almost a week of similar emails they all blur into one and I think to myself, “hey didn’t you send me something yesterday?”

Today as I stared blankly at my email I remembered, email is communication and none of this was communication I really want, yeah it’s good to be reminded from time to time of the companies I bought stuff from, but honestly I don’t need 10 plus emails a day to help spend my limited funds.

As I unsubscribed from each site I had a twinge of satisfaction as I realised they might get less email tomorrow… wait is that a good thing?, how will I know my email is working if I don’t get spam??

 

 

As humans with a lot of responsibly (largely based on promises we have made; and to preserve our integrity), we attempt to do what is probably only possible for short periods of time. Multitask.
Here are some examples:

Reading a book while washing dishes in a sink full of hot water and soap suds.

Ironing a shirt while tying a shoe lace.

Climbing on the roof while doing home work.

Watching TV while listening talking to someone on the telephone.

Playing with one child while helping another put on school clothes.

Washing clothes while doing the dishes, while bathing two children, while helping another with homework, while encouraging another to do their homework. Then one of the children gets out of the bath and dripping wet slips on the dining room floor, and now your’ playing nurse.

I think when I try to do more than one thing at a I’m setting myself up to fail. The reason is feedback. There is communication between what we are doing, our surroundings, and our inability to make unpredictable events happen in a predictable pattern.

I suggest that many people cannot listen and talk at the same time. We try its true, but there is usually a lag time, and after the initial excitement of a mutual conversation, one person has to take the lead and the conversation takes on a rhythm of its own. I find the more intense I become in giving my message, I fail to be able to listen to the feedback. Many would agree than in an argument we often talk too much. In life I think we are doing too much in exactly the same way.

We become so intensely involved in what we are doing, that we cannot successfully do anything well. The “less is more principle” is allocating ‘one after another’ tasks, thus doing one thing at a time and being more successful at it than trying to multitask and failing at all.

 

 

 

 

 

Red or white

 Random  Comments Off
Jul 192011
 

Having the option which bottle to lie down in the fridge. The milk or the red creaming soda? The red of course, at least it’ll be a pretty sticky mess and less stinky than the milk. Oh the choices we make when there is limited space in the fridge

 

Having only recently joined facebook, I was surprised by the number of people that send communication via the message service. This is not all that unuasual but I prefer email.
My Brother in law says he doesnt use email.? So i am curious. If I dont have someone linked to my face book, or linkedin or Google+ account… how do I message them other than use email?

 

Sometimes in the humdrum of life we can forget the one thing
that keeps us going…  the pause.

 

Pause to reset

Pause to rest

Pause to contemplate

Pause to relax

Pause to get control

Pause to realise what matters

Pause to think

Pause to….. Pause.

Simplicity is pausing deciding and doing, rather than letting it do us. I think we are born to act rather than to be acted upon.

We are not to be as leaves on the water top, pushed about by the wind, rain, currents and waves. Nor are we are the rock dropped in the
water, which causes a ripple which subsides in time and then we sit on the bottom of the pond. We are more like the boat. We have a sail, we have a
rudder, we have control. With this we harness the wind and the currents to take us somewhere. In order to get there we have to decide and that decision of
action is simply this. “I want to go there”

It is that simple. ‘Pause’, ‘Make a decision’ and ’ Go’. It is that simple.

We have the agency to act.

Cleanup the world

 Random  Comments Off
Mar 062011
 

My youngest just came back from a walk with the family. I asked her “Where did you go? And she replied, “Just went for a walk so we can clean up the world.” – so cute, she’s 4.

Double Standards

 Random  Comments Off
Jan 282011
 

I have standards. These are the minimum set of behavioural rules I’ve set for myself. Fortunately they are closely aligned with what my parents taught me and what I teach my children. And whilst they are developed based on my religious belief, they apply to me in all circumstances. Otherwise it wouldn’t be a standard. I could be accused of failing to meet the standards from time to time, and that is life. So I focus on efforts to improve my behaviours to meet these standards. Then as I meet these I might shift them to “higher” standards.

If my standards are different to someone elses’ standards, does that mean that if I accept someone elses behaviour based on their standards, that I can be accused of a double standard? How can one have double standards anyway, double means to take ‘something’ and add to it, the same value (A + A = B or Ax2 = B). If I were to take my standards and double them, how do I double my efforts to wear only modest clothes?

I think the correct term would be hypocrite. Saying your standard is “this” and doing something else, or applying your ‘standards’ differently depending on the situation. The standard is the behaviour, and changing the standard suit the behaviour is no standard at all.

This is the fundamental principle of a standard. In any situation, I will behave in this manner. If I choose not be a “prawn eater”, then the application of this standard applies to parties, just as well as it would to a late night snack. If I have an addiction, then a standard is good as it helps to set the boundary and what behaviour the individual is aiming for. We might fail as we attempt to balance our standards with our behaviour, but it doesn’t mean the standard is bad, just because we feel guilty. It means that change takes time and a double standard is just another, kinder way to not say hypocrite, because it would appear that we are judging someone elses’ behaviours against our perceived impression of their standards and that would against our standards of begin kind to others and we’d become the hypocrite.

Marriage Equality

 Family  Comments Off
Jan 272011
 

It has come to my attention that a small minority in our country are seeking to change the meaning of the first and most sacred institutions known to man, marriage.

Marriage is a unified institution. Marriage means a committed, legally sanctioned relationship between a man and a woman. That’s what it means in our secular law and has for all of human existence. I believe that we cannot have that marriage coexisting institutionally with something else called a ‘same-gender’ marriage. It is simply a definitional impossibility. To change the definition is to redefine the institution to being one of genderless marriage.

Until quite recently, in a limited number of countries, there has been no such thing as a marriage between persons of the same gender, and yet almost suddenly we are faced with the claim that thousands of years of human experience should be set aside because we should not discriminate in relation to the institution of marriage. When that claim is made, the burden of proving that this step will not undo the wisdom and stability of millennia of experience lies on those who would make the change. Yet the question is asked and the matter is put forward as if those who believe in marriage between a man and a woman have the burden of proving that it should not be extended to some other set of conditions.

So I asked my 6 & 8 year old daughters, What is marriage? To which they replied “You need a girl and boy to get married… or else you can’t make children”.
I oppose any so-called ‘Marriage Equality Bill’, because it would completely change the meaning marriage has had throughout history. Marriage is vital for creating families and raising children who need both a mother and a father.

© 2012 Random Thoughts Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 160 access attempts in the last 7 days.